Home | Abalone | Shrimp | Mudcrab | Grouper | Milkfish | Tilapia | Catfish | Bighead Carp | Freshwater Prawn | Seabass | Seaweeds    
 
 
Brackishwater pond culture of black tiger shrimp

Technology Description

Brief description: This new technology on shrimp farming in brackishwater ponds incorporates pollution management which constitutes 9% of annual shrimp production cost per ha of the farmer. Pollution management is worth the cost considering that a shrimp farmer could lose it all during a disease outbreak.

Environment-friendly practices include:

(1) Lowered stocking density ~ this may decrease harvest volume by 20-30% but
     the harvest value could increase by 8-10%due to bigger size and improved feed
     conversion. Feeding and nutrient loading is reduced by 20%, and the risk of  
     opportunistic diseases is reduced as well.

(2) Improvement of pond bottom management ~ this may increase plowing or tilling cost, add netcage construction to the      expense but these costs could be recovered from the sale of added fish crop. Bacterial profile of sediment is improved,      however, as well as water effluent quality. The pathogenic Vibrio count is reduced.
(3) Crop rotation ~ one shrimp crop may be lost but there is some income from fish culture. Crop rotation improves sediment      bacterial profile, reduces Vibrio count, reduces incidence of white spot, and ultimately allow time for organic waste to      break down.
(4) Improvement in feed quality ~ SEAFDEC/AQD has formulated a diet much improved in nutritional quality and lower      nitrogen and phosphorus discharges. Farmers may also use probiotics.
(5) Stocking of laboratory-screened fry ~ there is a cost to fry analysis and screening and waiting time for the results, but the      farmer is reducing the risks for white spot and pathogenic Vibrio infections.
(6) Use of greenwater technology ~ culture area may be reduced by 25-50% due to the requirement for bigger reservoir but      cost can be recovered from the sale of fishes raised in the reservoir. There is also added expense for modifying the water      supply channel. The advantage is more stable water quality, and suppression of growth of pathogenic Vibrio.
(7) Use of probiotics in water and feed ~ this can add a cost of P20,000 to P40,000 per ha per crop but healthy, antibiotic-     free shrimp is produced. Improved water quality and lower sludge accumulation are the benefits, in addition to reducing      the risk of developing more virulent antibiotic-resistant strains of bacteria.
(8) Increase in aeration ~ addition of P150,000 to 200,000 per ha for aerators and 50-60% increase in power consumption but      the shrimp grow faster and improve its feed conversion with increased dissolved oxygen levels and reduced noxious      metabolites.
(9) Use of settling ponds ~ additional cost of P2,500 to 5,000 per ha per year but settling ponds lower load of suspended      solids in effluent water and reduce the sediment accumulation in receiving waters.
(10) Employment of biosecurity measures ~ additional cost of P15,000 to 20,000 per ha per year for pond sanitation, carrier      exclusion devices, filters, and worker hygiene but these measures significantly reduce the risk of introducing viral      diseases to the pond facility.

Technology profile:
 

(1) Re-engineer the farm layout by providing a bigger reservoir; impounding a portion of the mangrove area near the ponds to      where effluents may be held; and assigning sedimentation and biological treatment ponds containing fish, bivalves and      seaweeds.
(2) Prepare the ponds. Drain totally. Level the pond bottom. Dig peripheral and central canals. Crack-dry. Remove the black      sludge that accumulated in previous cropping. Flush the pond with water then drain. Apply either agricultural lime at 2      tons per ha or hydrated lime at 0.5 to 1 ton per ha. Till the pond bottom. Compact. Install the central and side sludge      collectors. Install catwalks and feeding trays in grow-out ponds. Let in water. Position the aerators and the pumps. Apply      teaseed powder at 50 kg per ha to kill predators and competitors. Apply dried chicken or cow manure at 300 kg per ha      together with urea (45-0-0) at 18 kg per ha by the “tea bag” method. Fertilize again if necessary.
(3) In the reservoir (25% of the grow-out farm), stock biomanipulators like all-male tilapia and milkfish at 5,000 to 10,000 fish      per ha. Hold water for at least a week before using it in grow-out ponds.
(4) In the grow-out ponds, acclimate then stock disease-free shrimp (at least postlarvae day 18) at 25 pieces per m2, which      gives the highest net profit per ha of P1.8 million. Stocking lower at 15 pieces per m2 can get you P1.1 million; while      stocking higher at 40 pieces per m2 gives only P0.6 million. Biomanipulators may be stocked inside walled net      enclosures (10 x 10 x 1.5 m) that are placed in the middle of the grow-out ponds. These fishes can feed on the sludge      that the paddle-wheel aerators tend to deposit at the center. The sides of the ponds may also be enclosed similarly and      stocked with biomanipulators.
(5) Follow the usual pond routine ~ feed according to the feed manufacturer’s instructions, sample stock regularly to adjust      feeding demand, monitor water quality and bacterial populations regularly, keep complete records. If probiotics is an      option, follow the application rate in the label. Operate the aerators from 6 pm to 6 am.
(6) In the low discharge system, a small amount of water is discharged from the grow-out pond and released to the sea after      passing through the settling or mangrove impoundment. To be effective, hold pond effluents in mangroves for 6 hours or      more.
(7) In the recirculating system, effluents from the grow-out pond are reused after passing through the treatment pond. Water      is fully circulated by pumping twice, first from the head reservoir to the grow-out pond and then from the treatment pond to      the grow-out pond.
(8) In treatment ponds, the effluent from the grow-out ponds passes through several hurdles. Note that the main drain canal      can serve as one of the treatment ponds. Install baffles to serve as mechanical filtration units and to settle suspended      solids. Dissolved nutrients can be taken up by biofilters like oysters, the seaweed Gracilaria, and green mussel, and      these are stocked in the treatment ponds. Finally, a filter box fitted with a 2 hp submersible pump is installed at the end      of the pond.
(9) Harvest in 4-5 months by totally draining the ponds. Chill and sort before packing shrimp. Average weight is at least 25      grams.

Technical Assumptions

Item

Without Biosecurity 

With Biosecurity 

Project duration (years)

5

5

Production area (ha)

1

1

No. of crops /year

2

2

Days of culture /crop

150

150

Stocking density (fry/ha)

250,000

250,000

Biomanipulators stocking density (fry/ha)

6,000

6,000

Survival rate of shrimp (%)

40

70

Survival rate of biomanipulators (%)

60

60

Ave. body weight of shrimp at harvest  (g) 

30

30

FCR of shrimp

2

1.7

Production of shrimp per ha per crop (kg)

3,000

5,250

Production of shrimp per year (kg)

6,000

10,500

Farmgate price of shrimp (P/kg)

300

300

Production of biomanipulators/year (kg/yr)

540

540

Farmgate price of biomanipulators (P/kg)

50

50

 
Investment

Item

Without Biosecurity 

With Biosecurity 

Life Span (years)

Capital Outlay

 

 

 

  Farm facilities
     (quarters/shelter, warehouse )          

12,000

12,000

6

  Pond dikes, gates and dikes 
     (leveling, construction and development)

190,000

190,000

5-10

  Biosecurity
     (bird scaring devices, fences, disinfectants)

 - 

182,000

5

Equipment  
     (pumps and paddle wheels                        

248,000

248,000

10

Annual depreciation cost/yr

108,600

1,814,000

 

Salvage value (10%)

178,500

178,500

 

Total investment cost

450,000

632,000

 

 
Costs-and-Returns
 

Without Biosecurity 

With Biosecurity

Variable Cost 

 

 

   Pond preparation 

67,600

76,800

   Fry

125,000

125,000

  Feed and Feed Additives

660,000

1,043,250

  Laboratory Analysis

20,000

20,000

  Electricity and Fuel

52,000

80,000

  Biosecurity

 - 

160,000

  Biomanipulators

16,000

16,000

  Labor

30,000

32,000

  Harvest

8,000

14,000

Total Variable Cost 

978,600

1,567,050

Fixed Cost (per year)

 

 

   Land rental

 - 

 - 

  Repair and Maintenance

50,000

50,000

  Salary and Wages

120,000

168,000

  Depreciation

108,600

181,400

  Interest (12 %)

33,432

47,928

Total Fixed Cost

312,032

447,328

Total Cost

1,290,632

2,014,378

Revenue

 

 

  Sale of shrimp

1,800,000

3,150,000

  Sale of tilapia

27,000

27,000

  Sale of milkfish

27,000

27,000

Total Sales

1,854,000

3,204,000

 
Economic Indicators

 Item

Without Biosecurity 

With Biosecurity

Income per year

563,368

1,189,622

ROI (%)

43.65%

59.06%

Payback period          

2.09

1.57

Break-even price

215.1

191.85

Break-even production

1,040.11

6,714.59

 
Financial Investment Analysis (after 5 years)

                 Item     

Without Biosecurity 

With Biosecurity

Gross Revenue

9,448,500

16,198,500

Investment Cost

(450,000 @Y0)

   (632,000 @Y0)

Total Cost

6,453,160

10,071,890

Net Income

2,995,340

5,494,610

Net Present Value @ 12% (NPV)

1,501,876

3,355,006

IRR (%)

124

188

Discounted BCR (Cost & Return Benefits)

4.74

6.95

 
Updated: January 23, 2008
 
References
 

Baliao DD. 2000. Environment-friendly schemes in intensive shrimp farming. State-of-the-Art series, SEAFDEC and ASEAN. 27 p

Baliao DD, Tookwinas S. 2002. Best management practices for a mangrove-friendly shrimp farming. Aquaculture Extension Manual No. 35, SEAFDEC Aquaculture Department. 51 p

de la Peña LD, Lavilla-Pitogo CR, Namikoshi A, Nishizawa T, Inui Y, Muroga K.  2003.  Mortality in pond-cultured shrimp Penaeus monodon in the Philippines associated with Vibrio harveyi and white spot syndrome virus. Fish Pathology 38:59-61

Feed Development Section. 1994. Feeds and feeding of milkfish, Nile tilapia, Asian sea bass, and tiger shrimp. Aquaculture Extension Manual 21. SEAFDEC Aquaculture Department, Tigbauan, Iloilo. 97 p

Honculada-Primavera J.  1991.  Intensive prawn farming in the Philippines – Ecological, social, and economic implications.  Ambio 20:28-33

Honculada-Primavera J.  1993.  A critical review of shrimp pond culture in the Philippines.  Reviews in Fisheries Science 1:151-201

Honculada-Primavera J, Lavilla-Pitogo CR, Ladja JM, de la Peña MR.  1993.  A survey of chemical and biological products used in intensive prawn farms in the Philippines.  Marine Pollution Bulletin 26:35-40

Hatch U, Agbayani RF, Belleza E.  1996.  Economic analysis of prawn (Penaeus monodon) culture in the Philippines, II: Grow-out operations.  Asian Fisheries Science 9:127-141

Infotips on mangrove-friendly shrimp farming, 8-leaflet folder, undated. SEAFDEC and ASEAN 

Lavilla-Pitogo CR, Lio-Po GD, Cruz-Lacierda ER, Alapide-Tendencia EV, de la Pena LD. 2000. Diseases of penaeid shrimps in the Philippines. Aquaculture Extension Manual No. 16, 2nd edition; SEAFDEC Aquaculture Department, Tigbauan, Iloilo. 83

Leaño EM, Lio-Po GD, Nadong LA, Tirado AC, Sadaba RB, Guanzon NG Jr..  2005.  Microflora of the “green water” culture system of tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon. Aquaculture Research 36:1581-1587

Lio-Po GD, Leaño EM, Peñaranda MMD, Villa-Franco AU, Sombito CD, Guanzon NG Jr.  2005.  Anti-luminous Vibrio factors associated with the “green water” grow-out culture of the tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon. Aquaculture 250:1-7

Lio-Po GD, Lavilla-Pitogo CR, Cruz-Lacierda ER. 2001. Health management in aquaculture (textbook). SEAFDEC Aquaculture Department, Tigbauan, Iloilo. 187 p

Matsuura T, Salayo ND, Siar SV, Baticados DB, Primavera JH.  2004.  Changes in farm management and production systems: Response to shrimp culture problems in the Philippines. Japan Regional Fisheries Society: Regional Fisheries Research 45:53-66

Primavera JH.  1997.  Socio-economic impacts of shrimp culture (review).  Aquaculture Research 28:815-827.

Primavera JH.  1998.  Mangroves as nurseries: Shrimp populations in mangrove and non-mangrove habitats.  Estuarine and Coastal Shelf Science 46:457-464

Samonte GPB, Agbayani RF, Tumaliuan RE.  1991.  Economic feasibility of polyculture of tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) with Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in brackishwater ponds.  Asian Fisheries Science 4:335-343

Tendencia EA, de la Peña LD.  2001.  Antibiotic resistance of bacteria from shrimp ponds.  Aquaculture 195:193-204

Tendencia EA, de la Peña MR.  2003.  Investigation of some components of the greenwater system which makes it effective in the initial control of luminous bacteria. Aquaculture 218:115-119

Tendencia EA, de la Peña MR, Choresca CH Jr..  2005.  Efficiency of Chlorella sp. and Tilapia hornorum in controlling the growth of luminous bacteria in a simulated shrimp culture environment. Aquaculture 249:55-62

Tendencia EA, de la Peña MR, Choresca CH Jr.  2006.  Effect of shrimp biomass and feeding on the anti-Vibrio harveyi activity of Tilapia sp. in a simulated shrimp-tilapia polyculture system.  Aquaculture 253:154-162

Tendencia EA, Fermin AC, de la Peña MR, Choresca CH Jr.  2006.  Effect of Epinephelus coioides, Chanos chanos, and GIFT tilapia in polyculture with Penaeus monodon on the growth of the luminous bacteria.  Aquaculture 253:48-56

Tookwinas S. 2000. Closed-recirculating shrimp farming system. State-of-the-Art series, SEAFDEC and ASEAN. 28 p

Xu ZK, Primavera JH, de la Peña LD, Pettit P, Belak J, Alcivar-Warren A.  2001.  Genetic diversity of wild and cultured black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) in the Philippines using microsatellites.  Aquaculture 199:13-40.

 

© 2008 SEAFDEC Aquaculture Department

NOTE TO THE MEDIA: Materials in this site may be freely quoted as long as acknowledgment to 

SEAFDEC / AQD is made and a copy of the article where the AQD material appeared is sent to 

aqdchief@seafdec.org.ph or to any of our contact addresses.